What's the best way to call a generic method when the type parameter isn't known at compile time, but instead is obtained dynamically at runtime? Consider the following sample code - …

Mar 26, 2015 · Note about the placing of the function parameter list When using a Generic() to select a function based on the controlling-expression you have the choice of including the …

Mar 24, 2014 · You can certainly define generic delegates, after all, that's exactly what Func and Action are. They are treated as generic definitions, just like generic interfaces and classes are. …

I have a generic method that takes a request and provides a response. public Tres DoSomething<Tres, Treq>(Tres response, Treq request) {/*stuff*/} But I don't always want a …

Sep 18, 2022 · This will also register all the generic handlers and you won't even have to register it explicitly inside the DI. btw The method you used to handle generic registration is the way …

I have a generics class, Foo<T>. In a method of Foo, I want to get the class instance of type T, but I just can't call T.class. What is the preferred way to get around it using T.class?

So, two questions: Why do we observe this weird behaviour? What keeps us from comparing the values of generic types which are known to be IComparable? Doesn't it somehow defeat the …

Dec 1, 2009 · A generic method or class is designed to work for any type. This is most easily illustrated in the List<T> class, where it can be tailored to be a list of any type. This gives you …

Jun 3, 2010 · I am trying to create a generic extension that uses 'TryParse' to check if a string is a given type: public static bool Is&lt;T&gt;(this string input) { T notUsed; return T.TryParse(input,...

Feb 11, 2015 · Why? Because under the hood, the compiler will go away and create a new type (sometimes called a closed generic type) for each different usage of the "open" generic type. …